Implied action ..or not ?

Not doing/saying something, doesn't imply the opposite.
Doing/saying something is implies whatever the action/speech is.

But if you were doing something regularly to the effect that has positively or negatively affect people around you, once you stop doing it, it implies otherwise.

e.g. Relationship.
Situation 1
'Nice guy' gives 'girl' a hug and a speech of love everyday. One day he stops doing so, she thinks he stop loving and caring for her.
Situation 2
'Silent guy' never knew how to express his feelings to 'girl', never showed it in action. Miraculously, out of the blue he felt romantic and bought a bouquet of flower for her. Girl feels out of the world.

e.g. Friendship.
This applies to the beginning stage of friendship, whereby 2 individuals are getting to know each other better. It takes one active and one passive to arise in those 2 person, probably switching in turns. Somehow I believe in a certain personal contribution of some sort in order for a friendship to progress . Once one of them stays passive all the time, it hardly moves from where it is anymore. ''It takes two to tango''. But of course, it only takes more effort at the beginning, like every other thing we do. After which, you cling on to each other like link-chains effortlessly.

e.g. Family
...........whenever we are with them, I guess I can speak on behalf of everyone that, we never imply anything through our actions, or at least never thought of it, because it's just pure sincerity. They are afterall, the reason why 'we' are 'we' today,right ?

HAHA just a thought that I had while walking to squash court today (something must'av triggered it, don't know what), but i'm sure everyone already notice this fact lol.

o.O or i don't even know if it makes any sense ..